3 edition of Evaluating federally sponsored programs found in the catalog.
Evaluating federally sponsored programs
Includes bibliographies and index.
|Statement||Charlotte C. Rentz, R. Robert Rentz, issue editors.|
|Series||New directions for program evaluation ;, no. 2|
|Contributions||Rentz, Charlotte C., Rentz, R. Robert.|
|LC Classifications||H62.A2 N4 no. 2, H62.5.U5 N4 no. 2|
|The Physical Object|
|Pagination||ix, 98 p. ;|
|Number of Pages||98|
|LC Control Number||78056395|
1 Describe the organizations implementing federally funded HMRE programs for youth and the youth served by these programs by collecting and analyzing multiple sources of quantitative and qualitative data. 2 Assess whether HMRE programming for . Interest Income Paid on Non-Federal Sponsored Funds Policy Interfaculty Involvement (IFI) Guidance (login required) Internal Grant-Making Program Establishment Guidance.
The authors did not perform an evaluation of program outcomes. More recently, Pathman et al. () conducted an evaluation of selected state program outcomes based on surveys sent to state-obligated physicians and a comparison group of physicians in – The loan programs had the lowest mean service completion rate ( percent. The Vaccines For Children (VFC) program is a federally funded program that provides vaccines at no cost to children who might not otherwise be vaccinated because of inability to pay. CDC buys vaccines at a discount and distributes them to grantees—i.e., state health departments and certain local and territorial public health agencies—which.
CASEL Program Guides Effective Social and Emotional Learning Programs. The CASEL Guide provides a systematic framework for evaluating the quality of social and emotional programs and applies this framework to identify and rate well-designed, evidence-based SEL programs with potential for broad dissemination to schools across the United States. The Guide also shares best-practice . An evaluation of state-level tobacco-program expenditures on youth smoking, as part of the Monitoring for the Future project, found that if states had spent on tobacco control the minimum amount recommended by CDC, the prevalence of smoking among 8th-, 9th-, and 12th-graders would have been % lower than the rates observed from to
Neighborhood street design guidelines
Diagnostic criteria in dermatology
DIRECTORS DISCRETIONARY FUND REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1997... NASA/TM-1998-112216... JUN. 1, 1998.
Issues in Philippine education
internal constitution of the stars
Monumental Remains of Georgia/Part 1
survey of the public schools of the Philippines
Hughenden Manor, Buckinghamshire
Computational Fluid Dynamics
Songs from Vagabondia
To regulate the manufacture, sale, and use of weights and measures.
Cost rates at federally sponsored research institutions. The report has three purposes. To help develop a clear understanding of indirect cost issues, we provide a brief history of the development of federal indirect cost policies and payments since World War II, define the terms and concepts most commonly used when discussingFile Size: KB.
The effectiveness of federally sponsored curricular materials--ORIGINS (for to year-old students) and SMILE (for 5- to 7-year-old students)--designed to teach English to non-native English speakers within the Australian school system was studied.
Results of the multimethod assessment indicate that the centrally produced materials were by: 1. The book's four main sections include: Introduction; Administrative Functions and Practices; Management Issues in Special Areas; and New Developments. Among the resources appended are an Office of Sponsored Projects faculty evaluation form; excerpts from the National Science Foundation guidelines for proposal preparation; a checklist for a Author: Margery E.
Hoppin. The evaluation of federal social programs, using scientific techniques, offers policymakers and the public ample opportunities to learn about the effectiveness of government programs. COVID Resources.
Reliable information about the coronavirus (COVID) is available from the World Health Organization (current situation, international travel).Numerous and frequently-updated resource results are available from this ’s WebJunction has pulled together information and resources to assist library staff as they consider how to handle coronavirus.
Program evaluation is one of ten essential public health services  and a critical organizational practice in public health.  Until recently, however, there has been little agreement among public health officials on the principles and procedures for conducting such studies.
Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an. between evaluation and program implementation. Evaluation is a provided a systematic method for assessing the performance of federal program activities through a review of program purposes and design, strategic planning, management, and results and accountability.
NSF efforts also incorporated the Academic Competitiveness Council's (ACC). Evaluating program performance is a key part of the federal government’s strategy to manage for results. The program cycle (design, implementation and evaluation) fits into the broader cycle of the government’s Expenditure Management System.
Plans set out objectives and criteria for success, while performance reports assess what has been. Summer programs that provide small group or individual instruction produce the largest impact on student outcomes.
Summer programs that require some form of parental involvement produce larger, positive effects than programs without this component. Remedial summer programs may have a larger effect on math achievement than on reading.
The U.S. Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration (ETA) provides information on training programs and other services that are available to assist workers who have been laid off or are about to be laid off.
For a list of programs nearest you, contact an American Job Center or call ETA's toll-free help line at US-2JOBS (TTY: ).
In its broadest meaning, to evaluate means to ascertain the worth of or to fix a value on some object. In this book, we use evaluation in a more restricted sense, as program evaluation or interchangeably as evaluation research, defined as a social science activity directed at collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and communicating information about the.
There are two types of evaluation processes: summative and formative. The purpose of summative program evaluation is to judge the quality and worth of a program. On the other hand, the purpose of formative program evaluation is to provide feedback to help improve and modify a program.
Program assessment is intended as a formative evaluation and. The fundamental purpose of Test & Evaluation (T&E) is to provide knowledge to assist in Risk Management that’s involved in developing, producing, operating, and sustaining systems and capabilities.
The T&E process is an integral part of the Systems Engineering Process (SEP) which identifies levels of performance and assists the developer in correcting deficiencies. Programs by Eligibility.
Select one of the eligibility type links below for a list of all ED programs for which that type of organization or individual is eligible to apply. Individuals. Institutions of Higher Education.
Local Education Agencies. Nonprofit Organizations. Other Organizations and/or Agencies. State Education Agencies.
The program has three tracks: federal awarding agencies, pass-through or subaward entities, and recipients of federal grants. Additional Resources for Grant Management Grant management requires attention to detail and keeping up with best practices. The most effective means of evaluating federally funded research programs, the committee said, is expert review, which should be used to assess both basic and applied research.
The committee outlined three forms of expert review and their applications: quality review, relevance review, and benchmarking. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) established the Medicaid and CHIP Learning Collaboratives (MAC Learning Collaboratives) to achieve high-performing state health coverage programs, a goal that requires a robust working relationship among federal and state partners.
The MAC Learning Collaboratives are bringing together these partners to address common challenges and. This policy applies to all federally funded sponsored projects. It should be understood by Principal Investigators (PIs), Grant Managers, Department Managers, Department Chairs, Deans, Dean for Research, Sponsored Research Accounting (SRA) and the Office of Research and Project Administration (ORPA).
A recent virtual gathering sponsored by the Health Impact Project focused on the benefits of program evaluation methods that take into account such indicators of cultural and spiritual connection.
Doing so can advance health outcomes and help in assessing program impact and opportunities to improve performance.
The OCC is the federal regulator for national banks and federal savings associations. The following agencies have regulatory responsibilities for other types of financial institutions. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRS) Regulator for state-charted banks that are members of the Federal.
It introduces key issues in planning evaluation studies of federal programs to best meet decision makers needs while accounting for the constraints evaluators face.
It describes different types of evaluations for answering varied questions about program performance, the process of designing evaluation studies, and key issues to consider toward.The purpose of the instrument is to help Federal managers identify their leadership strengths and development needs.
Federal agencies as well as course participants from agencies across the government in OPM's Management Development Centers are using the assessment for succession planning and leadership development.The Program Manager’s Guide to Evaluation, this updated edition explains what program evaluation is, why evaluation is important, how to conduct an evaluation and understand the results, how to report evaluation findings, and how to use evaluation results to improve programs that benefit children and families.
Naomi Goldstein Director.